Executives are rapidly committing budget to agentic AI, yet fewer than a quarter say they truly understand how it works, creating avoidable risk. This CIO.com article argues that agentic AI is not an upgraded chatbot or simple automation, but an orchestration layer that breaks ambiguous requests into tasks, delegates them to specialised sub agents, and improves over time through continuous optimisation, which can drive hidden cloud spend, compliance exposure, and flawed talent decisions if it is deployed without proper governance. Using Talent Acquisition as an example, it explains agentic systems through an emergency department analogy: an orchestrator performs triage and routing, sub agents act like specialists handling discrete responsibilities, a large language model functions like the attending physician reasoning through nuance, and rigorous documentation and audit trails are essential to keep autonomy reliable and compliant. The core message is that agentic AI can reduce cost and risk, but only when leaders understand the architecture well enough to govern outcomes, because adoption momentum is currently outpacing comprehension.
