SWOT Analysis: The Case for Abolition vs. Radical Reform
📊 Roger Martin criticizes SWOT analysis, suggesting it's fundamentally flawed and recommending a hypothesis-driven approach for strategic decisions. Chris Legaspi counters by advocating for a reformed SWOT, emphasizing context, specificity, and actionable insights. He suggests starting with external opportunities and threats and using a TOWS matrix to create strategic actions. Combining both perspectives, a hybrid model emerges, integrating Martin's strategic discipline with Legaspi's tactical rigor, aiming to transform SWOT into a precise decision-making tool.
Share
